基于筋膜韧带的“丘比特提升”技术在光电面部年轻化领域的应用与疗效观察
摘要
目的：探讨基于筋膜韧带的“丘比特提升”技术在光电面部年轻化领域的临床应用和疗效观察。 方法：选取在 2022 年 2 月～ 2022 年 4 月至我院接受光电面部年轻化治疗的患者 40 例 , 依据随机抽样法将其分 为治疗组与对照组 , 每组患者各 20 例 , 观察组患者患者使用基于筋膜韧带的“丘比特提升”技术 , 对照组给予 标准化的治疗方式每组患者均进行一次治疗，比较治疗即刻和治疗一个月后的效果。对比两组面部年轻化优良 率、面部整形美容评价量表 (Face-Q) 评分波动情况、不良反应发生情况及对最终美容满意度。结果：试验组面 部年轻化优良率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)，分别为 95.00%、70.00%，提升幅度明显；治疗前两 组 Face-Q 评分对比，差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)，治疗后试验组面部整体满意度、颊部满意度、下面部和下 颌线满意度、鼻唇沟满意度、木偶纹满意度、社会功能、心理功能均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)； 两组不良反应发生率均为 0；试验组美容满意度评分显著高于对照组，差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。结论：“丘 比特提升”技术在面部年轻化中对于疗效的提升效果显著，可明显改善面部松垮垂纹等年轻化问题且安全性具 有保障。参考
[1] 周志强 , 杨蓉娅 . 微 ( 无 ) 创面部皮肤年轻化
的临床进展 [J]. 实用皮肤病学杂志 , 2015,8(6):438-440.
[2] 洪梁健 , 黄洁 , 孙林潮 , 颉玉胜 , 陶卫 . 长脉冲
1064nm Nd:YAG 激光与 2940nm Er:YAG 激光联合治疗面
部年轻化疗效分析 [J]. 中国美容医学 ,2021,30(11): 57-60.
[3] 徐和林 . 小切口去脂联合连续埋线治疗先天双
侧重睑不对称效果分析 [J]. 中国美容医学 ,2019,28(1):
12-15.
[4] 尹敏 , 殷珊 , 刘翔 , 吴姗姗 , 何加炜 , 周欢 , 周
佳 . 聚己内酯微球在“双 S”注射技术中的具体应用及
疗效观察 [J]. 中国医疗美容 ,2022,12(11):14-20.
[5] Mitz V, Peyronie M.The superficial musculoap
oneurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area[J].
Plast Reconstr Surg, 1976, 58 (2) :78-80.
[6] Pensler JM, Ward JW, Parry SW.The superficial
musculoaponeurotic system in the upper lip:an anatomic study
in cadavers[J].Plast Reconstr Surg, 1985, 75 (4) :486-494.
[7]Letourneau A, Daniel RK.The superficial
musculoaponeurotic system of the nose[J].Plast Reconstr
Surg, 1988, 82 (1) :48-57.
[8]Thaller SR, Kim S, Patterson H, et al.The
submuscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) :a histologic and
comparative anatomy evaluation[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,
1990,86 (4) :690-696.
[9]Morales P.Rhytidectomy:superazygomatic and
imfrazygomatic SMAS treatment[J].Aesthet Plast Surg,
1991,15 (1) :35-42.
[10]Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL.The relationship
of the superficial and deep facial fascias:relevance to
rhytidectomy and aging[J].Plast Reconstr Surg, 1992, 89 (3)
:441-449.
[11]Fabi SG，Goldman MP. Retrospective evaluation
of micro- focusedultrasound for lifting and tightening the
face and neck[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2014,40(5):569- 575.
[12]Fabi SG, Massaki A, Eimpunth S, et al. Evaluation
of microfocused
ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening,
and wrinklereduction of the décolletage[J]. J Am Acad
Dermatol, 2013,69(6):965- 971.
[13] Shah AR, Kennedy PM. The Aging Face. Med
Clin North Am.2018;102(6):1041-1054.
[14]Wong CH, Mendelson B. Newer Understanding
of Specific Anatomic Targets in the Aging Face as Applied
to Injectables:Aging Changes in the Craniofacial Skeleton
and Facial Ligaments.Plast Reconstr Surg.2015;136(5
Suppl):44S-48S.
[15]Kim BJ, Choi JH, Lee Y. Development of
Facial Rejuvenation Procedures:Thirty Years of Clinical
Experience with Face Lifts.Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(5):
521-531.
[16]Schaverien MV, Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ.
Vascularized membranes determine the anatomical
boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2):695-700.
[17]Lee JH, Hong G. Definitions of groove and
hollowness of the infraorbital region and clinical treatment
using soft-tissue filler.Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45(3):214-221.
[18]Freytag DL, Alfertshofer MG, Frank K,
Melnikov DV, Moellhoff N, Swift A, Heisinger S,
Gotkin RH, Ehrl D, Cotofana S. The Difference in Facial
Movement Between the Medial and the Lateral Midface:A
3-Dimensional Skin Surface Vector Analysis.Aesthet Surg
J. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):1-9. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab152.PMID:33
784397.
[19]ASHLEY WYSONG,etl.Quantifying Soft Tissue
Loss in Facial Aging:A Study in Women Using Magnetic
Resonance Imaging.Dermatol Surg 2013;39:1895–1902.
DOI:10.1111/dsu.12362
